I warned clients in 2020 that the traditional approach to compliance would not last. Now, the rules, timelines, and proof requirements piled up faster than teams could keep up. If your group still runs on spreadsheets and manual sign-offs, you are a corporate suicide candidate in 2025. The data is clear: automation cuts processing costs by about 25 percent and improves measures of resilience by roughly 80 percent, and regulators expect faster, clearer proof.
Regulators added big new demands in 2023 and 2024, and those burdens hit many teams in 2025. The EU’s Digital Operational Resilience Act increased compliance tasks by about 40 percent in 2024, which forced financial firms to produce more evidence and tighten third-party checks. That change means the volume of evidence to show regulators grew sharply, and manual evidence gathering cannot keep pace. Teams end up chasing paperwork instead of advising leaders on real risk.
Missing compliance deadlines and failing audits do not just cost fines. They drain time, distract leaders, and slow business deals. When teams spend days or weeks compiling audit packs, they cannot focus on important decisions that move the business forward. The hidden cost is the lost chance to prevent a bigger problem. Companies that lag on proof often see contract holds, slower sales cycles, and more executive hours spent on remediation.
These stories show a clear pattern. If evidence lives in many files with no owner, you will fail sooner or later. If you keep one clear record and short audit trails, you can answer regulators fast and stay in business.
Automation is not magic, but it handles the boring, routine work that eats time. When systems collect certificates, pull logs, and match controls to rules automatically, people stop chasing versions and start making decisions. Pilots and vendor reports show automation often reduces processing costs by 25 percent and raises measures of operational strength by about 80 percent in selected metrics. Those numbers let you build a simple business case for a pilot, and they help explain to leaders why change matters. A short pilot that shows real hours saved and cleaner audit packs usually wins board support. Start small, measure the gains, and then scale the approach across the parts of the business that face the most regulatory pressure.

Good teams fail not because they lack skill but because manual systems ask too much of people. Owners leave, emails are missed, and versions multiply. In that chaos good people spend their days copying files instead of advising. Automation frees people to focus on judgment and policy. It handles the routine assembling of proof and the simple alerts that point to real problems. With automation, expert people do expert work and auditors get one clear pack instead of five conflicting files.
A future-proof strategy starts with one source of truth for rules, controls, and evidence. Give each control one owner, log each change, and keep history so auditors see the full chain. Add checks that flag missing evidence or expired certificates. Tighten vendor clauses so third parties must provide proof on request. Report simple board metrics like the share of obligations with live evidence, the time to produce an audit pack, and the count of high-priority gaps. These numbers keep leadership focused and create accountability. Start by focusing on the highest risk areas like third-party checks and data protection controls. Make the first phase about proving you can show evidence quickly. This builds confidence and frees teams to focus on policy and risk advice instead of hunting files.
These steps are simple and fast. Use the 25 percent cost and 80 percent improvement numbers as benchmarks to show progress.
Technology alone will not fix the problem. You must change habits and policies. Make clear rules: no credentials in local files, no raw exports for audits, and a rule to flag odd requests. Train teams with short, practical sessions that show time saved and new tasks they can do. Secure executive sponsorship so that change is visible and funded. Measure behavior and celebrate when manual trackers are retired.
I called this shift years ago, and now the evidence is plain. Manual risk assessment in 2025 is like walking into a hurricane with a cardboard shield. The choice is stark: act now and keep your license to operate, or fall behind and face fines, delays, and lost trust.
If you want a straightforward conversation about where to start, reach out through iRM’s Contact Us page and tell them you need help moving proof into one clear place. They will guide you through a short plan to reduce audit time and show regulators the proof they want now.